LEC052006. Amrutha T.A. An Ecocritical Reading of "Prodigal Summer".
Amrutha T.A.
Dr. Joseph Koyippally
LEC 5104
3 February, 2021.
An
Ecocritical Reading of Prodigal Summer
Prodigal Summer (2000)
is the fifth novel by American author Barbara Kingsolver. It is an ecocritical
novel. Heavily emphasizing ecological themes and her trademark interweaving
plots, this novel tells three stories of love, loss and connections in rural Virginia.
Prodigal Summer
tells the story of a small town in Appalachia during a single, humid summer,
when three interweaving stories of love, loss and family unfold against the
backdrop of the lush wilderness of Virginia mountains. Kingsolver's extensive
education in biology is on display in Prodigal Summer. Her writing also
exhibits her knowledge of rural Virginia, where she grew up. Prodigal Summer weaves together three
stories of human love within a larger tapestry of lives inhabiting the forested
mountains and struggling small farms of southern Appalachia. Prodigal Summer is
a story of a small town in Appalachia, during a single, humid summer specifically
focussing on the lives of Deanna Wolfe, Landowski, and Garnett Walker. These
main characters are introverted and solitary individuals who have unique and
strong views about their natural surroundings. Throughout the course of a
spring and summer, their lives change drastically, and they realize that, they,
like other creatures, are not solitary. The characters are connected with all
living things like a complex web.
Barbara
Kingsolver is an American novelist who was born in 1955 in rural Kentucky. The
Bean Trees, Pigs in Heaven, The Poisonwood Bible, Small
Wonder, High Tide in Tucson, The Lacuna and Unsheltered
are her major works. Kingsolver has been acclaimed as an eco-friendly writer
and her extensive education in ecology is on display in her book, Prodigal Summer, laden with ecological
concept and biological facts. The novel covers the expanse of one summer in the
lives of several people in a remote area of Southern Appalachia. She describes
a season experienced by the inhabitants of an Appalachian farming community. Prodigal Summer weaves together three
stories of human life. Each section in the novel deals with the three main
characters and the story lines are named “Predators”, “Moth Love” and “Old
Chestnuts”. In this novel the reader learns about animals, insects, forests and
the intertwining ecological system in which they coexist by staying in a cabin
in the lush Appalachian mountains. The
idea that species balance is essential to a healthy ecosystem is ultimately
Kingsolver’s idea, because her characters Lusa, Deanna and Garnett work hard to
preserve species from the dangers. The novel is set in the mountain area filled
with various creatures. The author is very specific and gives a great deal of
scientific explanation for the flora and fauna of the forest. Kingsolver
explores an ecocentric theme in this novel. The 21st century
literature is concerned not only man’s deviation from nature but also exposes
his atrocity over it. Barbara Kingsolver, a prolific writer and an ardent
supporter of nature, expresses her concerns for nature and vehemently
castigates environmental abuses which jeopardize entire ecosystem. She believes
the interrelationship between nature and human beings which is interlocked in
the form of ecosystem. Therefore, any disturbance in any form to them will also
affect the remaining part of it.
Ecocriticism
is a term used for the observation and study of the relationship between the
literature and the earth’s environment. It takes an interdisciplinary point of
view by analyzing the works of authors, researchers, and poets in the context
of environmental issues and nature. The critics call this term as a broad
approach that is also by several other names such as environmental literary
criticism, green studies, and ecopoetics. It is also referred to by some other
fields such as ecology, social ecology, biopolitics, sustainable design, environmental
history, environmentalism and others. It was originated in the U.S. “Ecocriticism
was a term coined in the late 1970s by combining “criticism” with a shortened
form of “ecology”- the science that investigates the interrelations of all
forms of plant and animal life with each other and with their physical
habitats” (Abrams 98). Ecocriticism was first defined by Cheryll Glotfelty. “Ecocriticism
is the study of the relationship between literature and the physical
environment” (Glotfelty 19). Considering the definition, it can be clearly
called an “increasingly heterogeneous movement” that takes an entirely
earth-centered approach. It is mainly about the literature on the environment.
So, it is mostly seen in association with the “Association for the Study of
Literature and Environment”. ASLE has branches in Korea, Canada, Japan,
Australia, Taiwan, India and Europe and it holds biennial meetings for the
scholars, writing about the environmental issues in their literature. Deep Ecology,
Anthropocentrism and Ecocentrism are the key concepts of ecocriticism. Deep
Ecology is an environmental movement and philosophy which regards human life as
just one of the many equal components of global ecosystem. It believes in the
fundamental interconnectedness of all forms of life. “The shift from a human-centered
to a nature-centered system of values is the core of the radicalism attributed
to deep ecology” ( Garrard 21). Anthropocentrism regards humans as separate
from and superior to nature. It considers that human life has intrinsic value
while animals, plants and natural resources may be exploited for the benefit of
mankind. Ecocentrism is a concept which is used to denote a nature-centered system
of values. It gives great importance to nature and its resources.
The
major characters of Prodigal Summer such as Deanna Wolfe, Lusa Landowski
and Garnet Walker are highly conscious about the environment. When Deanna Wolfe
tries to protect coyotes, Lusa Landowski shows her love toward nature and
moths. Garnet grows the chestnut trees and encourages the use of natural
fertilizers. In ecocritical literary lens, these protagonists’ environmental
consciousness and ethical relationship with natural surroundings can be traced
clearly. Aldo Leopold is one of the pioneers in the development of modern
environmental ethics and in the movement for wilderness conservation with his
ecocentric or holistic ethics regarding land. He is one of the influential
American environmentalists. His ethics of nature and wildlife preservation has
a profound impact on the environmental movement. One of his well-known quotes
from his eminent book, A Sand County Almanac
(1949) gives us the idea of the conservation ethic or ‘land ethic’: “A
thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty
of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise” (Leopold 262). The
theme of ecological and sentimental interconnectedness is immediately evident
by the overall structure of Kingsolver’s novel. She interweaves three plots and
each plot deals with a female protagonist and male antagonist, where the female
character represents an environmental understanding and the male character
usually represents a reactionary and hubristic anti-environmental stance. The
opening description is made more remarkable by the manner in which Kingsolver
returns to her theme at the end of the novel. The final chapter begins with a
similar description of an unnamed ‘she’ walking on the edges of fields that
border the forest. Like Deanna in the first section, this female is intent on
seeing, smelling, and experiencing the forest, but we quickly realize that this
description is much more detailed, more earthy than the first, and it soon
becomes clear that this ‘she’ is a female coyote. The penultimate paragraph
returns to the notion of the speculative ‘man with a gun’ who might be watching
the coyote. This man might believe that he and the coyote are “the only two
creatures left here in this forest of dripping leaves” (Kingsolver 444). Like
the hypothetical observer in the beginning, this man is wrong: “But he would have been
wrong. Solitude is a human presumption” (Kingsolver 444). Everything is
connected, “an impalpable thread on the web” (Kingsolver 444). In Kingsolver’s
view, all connections; including those emotional and familial connections
termed as sentimental as well as those between predator and prey, are
inseparable parts of the ecosystem.
In
brief, Prodigal Summer discusses ecological issues by analysing the
personal histories and present circumstances of the characters in the novel. Kingsolver
addresses the struggle between mankind and nature in Prodigal Summer. The importance of the preservation of endangered
species is emphasized in the novel and it is the poignant portrayal of the fact
that there are some invisible threads connecting all the species together in
the biosphere. Some of the threads and their functions are still unknown to
humans, yet all species contribute to the balance of the biosphere. These
various characters play out the conflicts regarding man versus nature in the
backwoods county in Appalachia. It can be understood how the author feels about
this conflict, but she gives various viewpoints, allowing the reader to decide
what should be done in regard to the relationship between man and nature. On
analysing the novel Prodigal Summer, we
find that Kingsolver draws a beautiful picture of flora and fauna, wilderness
and the beauty of the natural environment in North American mountains,
landscapes and valleys. The novel is set up in Southern Appalachia. The lives
of the three female environmental conscience characters in the novel are
interconnected with each other. They are lonely individuals and they have
strong views about their natural surroundings. They observe nature very
carefully and they have respect towards natural surroundings. The characters
are connected with all living things like a complex web. The novel is laden
with ecological concepts and biological facts. Kingsolver describes a season
experienced by the inhabitants of Appalachian community. The title of the
novel, Prodigal Summer as well as
each section of the novel such as “Predators”, “Moth Love” and “Old Chestnuts”
refer to themes connected with nature and its creatures. The three women
protagonists have in common their independence. Kingsolver, a former biologist
and journalist, has a rare ability to communicate widely what she knows as a
scientist, and this novel sounds warnings against hunting predators who
compensate by breeding faster, or against pesticides that boost pest
populations by killing off the bugs that prey on them. Throughout Prodigal Summer, characters debate whether humans have the right to
control the natural world, or whether people instead have a responsibility to
maintain the intrinsic balance of nature. For Garnett Walker and Nannie Rawley,
the debate becomes a matter of religion, as well; for other characters, these
questions relationships and their overall outlook on life. Coyotes are a
prominent symbol of the importance of predators and the resilience of nature
throughout Prodigal Summer. Despite
humans’ effort to wipe out the creatures, coyotes have persisted; as Deanna
explains, because coyotes breed faster and work in groups when they are hunted,
“killing adults increases the chances of survival for the young” (Kingsolver
326). Coyotes represent nature’s ability to return to a balance, despite human
interference: with the coyotes’ re-emergence in the Zebulon Forest, the
ecosystem will once again have a “keystone predator” (Kingsolver 62) that
allows all species to thrive. The novel illustrates the theme of
interconnectedness through coyotes. Through the portrayal of these ecological concepts,
Prodigal Summer can be considered as an ecocritical novel.
Works Cited
Abrams, M H.
A Glossary of Literary Terms. 11th
ed. Language Learning, 2015.
Flader,
Susan. Thinking Like a Mountain: Aldo Leopold
and the Evolution of an Ecological
Attitude
Toward Deer, Wolves, and Forests. University of Missouri, 1974.
Garrard,
Greg. Ecocriticism. Routledge Taylor
and Francis Group, 2012.
Kingsolver,
Barbara. Prodigal Summer. Harper
Collins publishers, 2000.
Comments
Post a Comment