NAINA.T.P/ LEC052033 / ARTICLE OUTLINE

TITLE: Psychoanalytic Approach to Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.

PERSPECTIVE: The author's personal psychology is analysed and interpreted and drawn parallel with the characters of the novel.

HYPOTHESIS: The hideous monster created by the titular hero Victor Frankenstein actually is the consequential product or reflection of the psyche of the author.

OUTLINE:

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

Abrams, M H and Groffrey Galt Harpham. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Ceenage Learning ,2015.
Baldick, Chris. In Frankenstein's Shadow: Myth,Monstrosity and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford UP, 1987.
Bloom, Harold.The Anxiety of Influence. Oxford UP, 1997.
Bary, Peter. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Viva Books, 2018.
Adams, Will. "Making Daemons of Death and Love: Frankenstein, Existentialism and Psychoanalysis."Journal of Humanistic Psychology.vol.1,no.5,2001,np,doi.org/10.1777/0022167801414004.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LEC052004. Agna Philip. "Critical analysis of the significance of Lear's madness in King Lear"

Critical analysis of the significance of Lear’s madness in King Lear      Lear, the tragic hero of Shakespeare’s play King Lear is a king whose insane behaviour contributes a significant part in the play. His madness paved the way for his redemption and made him a better human. It also serves to provide a message to the leaders of Jacobean England as well.    Lear’s decision to divide the kingdom was an insane behaviour of suspicion. “Myths abounded about the catastrophic consequences of such division, leading to bloody civil war and fratricide. Shakespeare was writing during the reign of James I, a king seeking to strengthen ties between his two hostile kingdoms, England and Scotland” (Fox 255). Lear’s lunacy to divide the kingdom and its terrible consequences are portrayed as a caution for King James. Moreover, the play aids King James to realize the strength of natural power over human potency.    The effect of storm made Lear understand the insign...
Read more

LEC052009.Annette Sebastian. Critical analysis of the significance of 'equivocator' in Macbeth.

  The elements of equivocator overshadows throughout the tragic play  Macbeth  by William Shakespeare. Equivocator is a person who bends the language to deceive someone from interpreting the truth hidden in it. Equivocation was a defending strategy used by Jesuits in Shakeperean time to save their lives from the protestants. Its use was a heated debate during the Gun-powder plot.Written during the 1606, Macbeth reflects the socio-political aspects of the period.The equivocator portrayed in the porter's dream alludes to the Jesuit priest Henry Garnet. The technique of equivocation was brilliantly implemeted in the play through various charcters and their dialogues.The elemets of equivocation fills the play and it has also helped the audience in anticipating the plot.  Historically, the equivocator in the porter’s dream alludes to the trial of Henry Garnet for his complicity in the Gun-powder plot.Henry Garnet was a Jesuit priest who was hanged proving guilty in Gun-po...
Read more

LEC052001 Adwaidh. S Critical analysis of the equivocator in Macbeth

  Equivocation in Macbeth can be examined in the light of historical events. The playwright uses equivocators to condemn and criticize the act of equivocation practiced by the Jesuit Priests of  England, who planned the gun powder plot to execute the king James I of Scotland . Throughout Macbeth's life equivocation is playing crucial roles from his transformation into the king to his tragic death. In Macbeth there are more episodes of equivocation, compared to a single episode in Shakespeare's early play Hamlet , which was written in 1599. The play is filled with equivocal appearances-women with beard, Macbeth in "borrowed robes", a day turned into night, a peaceful castle without and a burning cauldron of evil within.  The Gunpowder Plot was discovered in 1605,finding father Henry Garnet guilty of the plan. Macbeth was written in 1606,with much more episodes of equivocation than the early play Hamlet which was written in 1599 and had only a single episode of equiv...
Read more