LEC052028: Leona Maria Renny. Critical Analysis of the reference to 'Equivocator' in Macbeth.

     

 

The reference to Equivocator plays a significant role in understanding Shakespeare's Macbeth with its religious and political influences. Through the play, Shakespeare is attempting to provide reference to the Gun powder incident of November 1605. It was a plan to blow up the Houses of Parliament, and to replace King James I with a catholic ruler. Nevertheless, the plot was discovered, and the plotters were executed, including the Jesuit priest Henry Garnet. This in turn connects the reference of Equivocator in Macbeth to the Gun Powder plot ("The Trial").   

Equivocator is a person who "deliberately use vague language in order to deceive people or to avoid speaking the truth"("Equivocator"). In Act 2 Scene 3 of Macbeth, the porter talks about an Equivocator who was refused entrance to heaven. The reference here is to Garnet, who being a Jesuit, supported and practiced equivocation to avoid incrimination. Apart from the Porter scene, there are several other hints that points to the same incident.   

Instances of Equivocation is evident in the dialogues of the witches. The doublespeak used by the witches is what leads Macbeth to believe that he is safe. "Laugh to scorn//The pow'r of man, for none of woman born// Shall harm Macbeth"(Shakespeare 4.1.79-81), which seems to be highly impossible, was in fact an equivocated statement. The emphasis is to be given for the word 'born’ but was mistook as 'woman' by Macbeth. Thus, Shakespeare has succeeded in imparting ironical references to these situations of the time through the dialogues of his characters. Apart from the reference to Garnet, another layer of implication can be found in the play.  

 The play was written in 1606, just three years after the succession of James I. He is believed to be the descendant of Banquo, the Thane of Lochquhaber. Thus, the succession of Banquo's sons to the throne can be an indication of the rule of James I. 

Even more importantly, King James was commonly believed to be descended from Banquo the thane of Lochquhaber, the historical counterpart of Shakespeare’s Banquo, the friend who Macbeth betrays and has murdered. With this in mind the witches’ prophesy that Banquo’s ancestors will be kings takes on a new meaning: it is referring to Banquo’s ancestor James Stuart, King of Scotland and England. By extension, it has been suggested that the escape of Fleance, Banquo’s son, from Macbeth’s murder plot is designed to echo James’s own escape from the Gunpowder Plot and to subtly compliment the House of Stuart as legitimate and truly-descended rulers.                                                                                     (“The Gunpowder Plot”)

Thus, by critically analysing the play, it can be concluded that the reference to Equivocator in the play Macbeth reflects the religious and political tensions of the time. Shakespeare who is known for his inclusion of contemporary incidents in his play has taken the risk of adding such a politically tense issue in Macbeth.

       

      Work Cited: 

 “Equivocate Definition and Meaning: Collins English Dictionary.” Collins English Dictionary, HarperCollins Publishers Ltd, n.d., www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/equivocate. Accessed 12 Jan.2021.

“The Gunpowder Plot and Shakespeare's Macbeth: Blogs & Features.” Shakespeare's Globe, www.shakespearesglobe.com/discover/blogs-and-features/2014/11/05/the-gunpowder-plot-and-shakespeares-macbeth/.

Shakespeare, William. Macbeth, Ed. Praveen Bhatia. UBS Publishers' Distributors Pvt. Ltd., 2014, Print.

Thebillshakespeareproject. “Macbeth and Equivocation.” The Bill / Shakespeare Project, 19 June 2016, thebillshakespeareproject.com/2016/06/macbeth-and-equivocation/#:~:text=The%20simple%20meaning%20of%20equivocator,to%20heaven%2C%20the%20Porter%20says.&text=The%20porter%20himself%20plays%20with,of%20sex)%20leaves%20him%20altogether.

“The Trial of Henry Garnet, 1606.” The British Library, The British Library, 23 Sept. 2015, www.bl.uk/collection-items/the-trial-of-henry-garnet-1606.

 

 

 

       

 

Comments

  1. The essay is structured properly with an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. But the essay lacks the title. The Works Cited does not follow alphabetical order.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A very systematic approach to the topic is given. The arguments are impressive with precise hypothesis and supporting statements. The keywords are well explained and there is a natural transition in paragraphs. The MLA format is followed and the works are cited accordingly. But the essay lacks a proper title and it is to be noted that the C in Catholic is to be capitalized.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The essay is well written.The transition between paragraphs is smooth. The title of an essay is just as important as its other components.The last paragraph should be formatted.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The essay is well structured but it lacks a title. There is a smooth transition between paragraphs. The works cited should be in alphabetical order.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There are enough points in the essay. Argument is supported by good references. The introductory paragraph could be modified. In my opinion the second paragraph is a suitable introductory paragraph. Properly concluded.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The thesis statement is clearly introduced. The following paragraphs elaborates and supports the thesis. The conclusion is well written and the structure is followed as a whole. The title 'Works Cited' is to be at the center and the colon used after it is to be avoided. Giving an appropriate title will further enhance the writing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The essay is a fine result of a methodological approach to the topic. But, to begin with, the most important component of it, the title, is missing. A very logical hypothesis is introduced with rationally explained arguments. A better transition from one paragraph to another would have made the essay more effective. Please be a bit more careful about the punctuations and capitalization. The MLA stylesheet has been followed to a greater extend. Apart from these, this is a well written essay with sufficient references.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The hypothesis is stated clearly, and the arguments support the hypothesis. However, the arguments feel a bit rushed, and only touched upon. Sound research is reflected in the historical and textual references. The MLA format is well adhered to.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LEC052004. Agna Philip. "Critical analysis of the significance of Lear's madness in King Lear"

LEC052009.Annette Sebastian. Critical analysis of the significance of 'equivocator' in Macbeth.

LEC052001 Adwaidh. S Critical analysis of the equivocator in Macbeth