LEC052007. Anagha Nair. Crtical Significance of the Ides of March in Julius Caesar

 

Anagha Nair

Dr. Joseph Koyippally

LEC 5104

13 January 2021

 

CRITICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE IDES OF MARCH IN

JULIUS CAESAR

The Ides of March corresponding to the 15th March in the Roman calendar is marked as the day of the assassination of Julius Caesar. Caesar was killed by conspirators- his friends- for fear of Caesar becoming a dictator once he is crowned the king. “The Ides of March is considered to be pivotal in Roman history as the death of Caesar contributed to the transition from the historical period known as the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire.” (The Literary Significance)

In the starting of the play when Caesar comes to address the jubilant crowd celebrating the victory of their hero, a soothsayer warns Caesar. However the soothsayer whose voice Caesar himself says is shriller than the voice of the crowd is not taken seriously.

            CAESAR. What man is that?

            […]

            CAESAR. He is a dreamer; let us leave him:-pass (I. ii. 18-24)

The soothsayer becomes a victim and a witness of Caesar’s hubris a second time in Act III Scene I when Caesar tells the soothsayer that the fifteenth of March has come implying the soothsayer’s prediction gone wrong, to which the soothsayer replies, “Ay, Caesar; but not gone.” (III.i.2)

            Caesar who enters the senate is brutally stabbed and killed by the conspirators, marking the fulfillment of the soothsayer’s prediction. The conspiracy to kill Caesar was first plotted by Cassius Longinus and Marcus Brutus fearing Caesar’s growing power and to the eventual rise of Caesar to the level of a dictator especially after his victory against Pompey. As Nicholas Horsfall says in his article “The Ides of March: Some New Problems”, the conspirators chose fifteenth of March as they wanted to finish off Caesar soon, before he gains the support and sentiments of the citizens of Rome (pp 0-1).

            Shakespeare has employed pagan myths and beliefs in the play to portray an overly superstitious Roman society. To warn Caesar about the impending tragedy Shakespeare uses the character of the soothsayer. This clearly portrays a society with deep rooted superstitions. Though Caesar is overpowered by his pride when the soothsayer approaches him, Caesar is presented as a superstitious person in the play- like during the feast of Lupercal. There are also mentions that Caesar has gone to see a soothsayer a month before the ides, who too warns Caesar about a possible tragedy within the next thirty days.

            Ides of March was marked by Romans as the day for settling debts and was also known for many religious observances. Due to its association with the assassination of Julius Caesar, the Ides of March has come to symbolize betrayal. Shakespeare’s mastery of the language has in a way forever darkened an otherwise normal day on Roman calendar.

 

 

 

Works Cited

Primary source

Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. M.G Publishers, 2015.

Secondary sources

Horsfall, Nicholas. “The Ides of March: Some New Problems.” Greece & Rome, vol. 21, no. 2, 1974, pp. 191–199. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/642733. Accessed 11 Jan. 2021.

“The Literary Significance of The Ides of March.” The Indian Express, 15 March 2020, https://indianexpress.com/article/books-and-literature/the-literary-significance-of-ides-of-march-6315265/. Accessed on 11 Jan 2021.

 

 

 

           

Comments

  1. Article was good with enough references. Paragraphs were connected which helps in a smooth reading.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good writing. Paragraphs are well structured but final paragraph could have been better. Arguments are supported and MLA style is strictly followed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very good writing. Beginning of the final paragraph was a bit deviating the continuity of the essay. You put reference at the end of first three paragraphs, which improves credibility, but it's excess might affect the uniqueness of your writing. Take care of that. It was a very good essay, indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good writing. Topic sentences are also strong but I was expecting more from you

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well written.Smooth flow of arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nice way of presentation with suitable arguments and references. Well-written.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The essay is well written and the introduction gives a clear idea about the thesis statement. The Literary Significance had to be enclosed within double quotes in the in-text citation. The abbreviation pp. is not required in the in-text citation. Shakespeare's name has not been mentioned in the in-text citations of the quotes from the play. The use of a comma in the 2nd sentence of the 2nd para and last line of the 4th para, would have given the sentences more clarity. The resources used, support the arguments in the essay well.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The essay is written well and it has a proper structure. But the last paragraph is too short. It could have been better by the addition of certain relevant sentences that can conclude the essay more effectively. MLA style is strictly followed throughout the essay. Only the first letter of the content words should have been italicized in the title.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good control over the language. The resources have been used very well to develop your idea.Title need not be completely capitalized unless recommended. In the in text citation period should follow after the parantheses, also, Shakespeare’s name needs to be included in the paranthesis.There was a deviation in the in text citation regarding specifying the page number.The conclusion part could have been developed more.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LEC052004. Agna Philip. "Critical analysis of the significance of Lear's madness in King Lear"

LEC052009.Annette Sebastian. Critical analysis of the significance of 'equivocator' in Macbeth.

LEC052001 Adwaidh. S Critical analysis of the equivocator in Macbeth