LEC052026 Jyothis Cyriac - Critical Analysis of Lear's Madness in King Lear.
Critical Analysis of Lear's Madness in King Lear
King Lear is the play by the greatest writer of all time, William Shakespeare which depicted the tragedy of the old king Lear. In this play, Shakespeare presents the strongest passions by which man can be agitated. One of the key motifs used in this play is madness. Through the portrayal of various levels and kinds of madness, Shakespeare asserts that there is no human emotion stronger and more powerful than the passion of madness. There is actual madness of King Lear and feigned madness of Edgar. The madness of King Lear plays a vital role in the overall plot and theme of the play. This essay is an attempt to delineate the critical significance of Lear’s madness.
We find King Lear step by step driven into a mad frenzy state. Though in the opening scenes itself the symptoms of Lear’s madness is visible, later the mental shock of his daughters disobedience and the physical shock of the storm completely unhinges the mind of Lear. The unnecessary test of love of his daughters and the banishment of his dearest daughter Cordelia and the faithful servant Kent in the beginning of the play are clearly the acts of an abnormal person. In the heath scene of the play his madness reaches its maximum height and in the later acts of the play, there is a gradual subsidence of insanity. We find a certain arch- like progress in the passion of Lear. In the heath scenes the passion of Lear reaches the point of raving and gradually thereafter weakens into a softness of brain. Filial ingratitude, restlessness, and the intolerable nature etc., are the major reasons for his madness. Lear himself is aware about his changing mindset. The old king pathetically tries to keep himself in temper: He pleads with sweet Heaven to keep him from madness-
“O, let me not be mad, not mad, sweet Heaven:
Keep me in temper; I would not be mad.” (Act 3)
In the act 3 of the play, at the peak of madness Lear rages at the storm, calling for universal destruction. The sight of poor Tom invokes a sense of sympathy for those less fortunate than himself. ‘Poor naked wretches’, Lear’s ‘mad’ companions, the Fool and Poor Tom, deepen the sense of his decline to insanity. He throws away his clothes and hallucinates about devilish spirits. The point to remember is that madness actually acted as a shield for the old man that protected him from the complete loss of sense. In the end of the play, Lear reaches in a state of realization of his mistakes and it can be interpreted as a kind of sublime experience.
“Throughout his career, Shakespeare explored various forms madness in his plays. He seems to have been particularly interested in madness as an agent of beneficial change. The suffering of mental disturbance could transform character’s views of themselves and others.” ( Bain, Smith, Morris 224)
This observation is hundred percent true in the case of King Lear. The Lear that we meet in the beginning of the play is not the Lear that we come across in the climax of the play. His attitude and vision undergoes drastic changes and Lear becomes a refined person through bitter experiences. He has learnt his truth; he has also learnt patience, which he teaches Glouchester - “Thou must be patient. We came crying hither. “ ( Act 4, scene 6).
The madness caused by natural means is also worth notable. In the heath scene, the physical storm represents the furious mindset of King Lear itself. It is true that King Lear has always been acknowledged as the most painful of Shakespeare’s tragedies. That is why there have been a number of attempts from critics to edit the storyline and climax of the play. The madness of Lear has played its role perfectly to increase the emotions. The audience feel sympathy towards Lear even though he acted unwisely and was cruel to the ones who loved him.
Another key thing to remember is that Shakespeare presents a corrupt society as the backdrop of this play; A society where the values of civilisation is no more exists. In such a situation nothing can be expected except insanity and abnormality. The critic Keneth Muir briefly describes this idea:
The madness of the elements, the professional madness of the fool, the feigned madness of Edgar, and the feigned madness of king himself together exemplify the break- up of society and the threat to the universe under the impact of ingratitude and treachery. (Muir 35).
In short, Shakespeare successfully used the technique of madness to present the theme of the play more appealing to audience and particularly Lear's madness has the significant role in the overall depiction of the theme.
Works Cited
Bain, Smith, Morris, Elspeth Bain, Rob Smith, Jonathan Morris. King Lear. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, books.google.co.in/books?id=jwMCXhufYH0C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage& q&f=false.
Muir, Kenneth. “Madness in King Lear.” Shakespeare Survey, edited by Allardyce Nicoll, vol. 13, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1960, pp. 30–40. Shakespeare Survey.
The hypothesis and the argument has been clearly stated. It would be good to focus more on grammar and sentence structure. The in-text citation done is not in the proper format( eg. Act 4 scene 6).
ReplyDeleteThe structure of the essay is well maintained. MLA format is not followed. The line spacing is not double. In text citation should be modified as (Act.Scene.Lines). Format of Works Cited is not in the MLA style.
ReplyDeleteEvidence of a thorough study is visible throughout the essay. But, please make sure that you stick to the format prescribed by the MLA Handbook. Properly stating the in-text citations and the references is very important, along with the line-spacing and proper fonts. So, please ensure that these are properly handled.
ReplyDeleteAn elaborate discussion of the title is given with strong arguments, hypothesis and genuine statements. The paragraphs are short and precise and the transition is fast. Quotes from critics have justified the topic sentence but the formatting is ambiguous. The in-text citation needs some refinement and the works cited has some issues like spacing, and the citation of a work with many others. The font should be changed to Times New Roman and the work King Lear should be in Italics.
ReplyDeleteThe essay has got a hypothesis and evidences that support it is presented. There is a minor issue with spacing both between lines and characters at certain places. The title of the play should be in italics. The first entry in the works cited list has the names of the authors repeated twice; make sure the MLA format is followed there.
ReplyDeleteThe essay discusses in detail about Lear's madness. But the whole essay being congested makes it difficult to read. Double spacing should be used. Title of the work should be italicized. The indented portion, in-text citation and end text citation are to be worked on.
ReplyDeleteThe essay is well structured. The titles of the works should be in italics.Double spacing should be used and the usage of too much space between words should be avoided. The font should be Times New Roman. Focus should be more on formatting the essay.It's important that you stick to the MLA Handbook.
ReplyDeleteThe essay does justice to the title. The title of the text should be italicized. MLA format must be followed while writing the essay. Double spacing must be used. In-text citation and works cited also needs some changes.
ReplyDeleteTtile: The name of the text needs to italicised and the title needs to be centre-aligned. There are grammatical errors in some areas. Sentence restructuring is necessary. The hypothesis is very clear along with a thesis statement. There are strong arguments that support the hypothesis. It is unnecessary for a two line quotation to be brought down to a separate paragraph. The concluding paragraph is only a line long.
ReplyDelete